Mining Conflicts in Peru Civil Resistance and Corporate Counterinsurgency
Michael S. Wilson Becerril
Vol 4, Issue 1 · pp. 99–132 · 2018 · DOI https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.097
Abstract
Studies of protest have argued that repression “backfires”—it activates indignation and galvanizes resistance. However, most activists know that this is not always the case. When does repression actually expand the ranks of social movements, granting them the “critical mass” needed to pressure authorities and win concessions, and when does it not? This paper distinguishes between private and public forms of repression and argues that behind-the-scenes, targeted repression by private actors is much less likely to backfire. Ethnographic and comparative research of mining conflicts in Peru uncovers how mining corporations marshal the state’s coercive apparatus as well as private intelligence, security, and media into a type of corporate counterinsurgency operations. Overtly and covertly, these work to delegitimize, intimidate, and demobilize opponents, with direct effects on the capacities and strategies of resistance.
Topics
Four ways to read this article
Already subscribed
Log in through your library
If your institution subscribes, or uses OpenAthens, you are recognised on arrival — no extra password.
Log in$59 a year
Subscribe
Read and download every article in the archive, from less than $5 a month, billed annually.
SubscribeFree to ask
Ask your library to subscribe
Fill in one form and we send the request to your institution on your behalf.
Send a request