Nonviolent resistance failure: internal reasons why campaigns struggle to win (and what we can learn from it)
Get Access
Is your library using openathens?
Click on ‘Login’ and you will be authenticated, your credentials will be detected. No need for further passwords.
Subscribe $59/ YEAR
With an annual subscription you will get access to ALL the articles. Read online or download, starting from less than $5 a month (billed annually)!
Ask your Library to Subscribe
Ask your institution or your library to subscribe to the Journal. Simply fill out this form, and your University will receive the request for you.
Abstract
Existing literature on nonviolent resistance typically emphasizes the elements that contribute to a campaign’s success. Conversely, mechanisms leading to the failure of such nonviolent resistance campaigns in democratic countries have been underexplored. The research is largely limited to external mechanisms of failure, which will be briefly outlined, including missed political opportunities, hard and soft repression by states and media, as well as conflicting interactions with other campaigns. Accordingly, this article analyzes the internal mechanisms explaining nonviolent resistance failure. Data from three campaigns of the German climate movement, primarily gathered through autoethnography and participatory action research, are brought into a reflective conversation with the nonviolent resistance literature to develop a framework of internal failure mechanisms. This includes: 1) lacking resources; 2) fragile organizational structures; 3) weak support bases; 4) ineffective tactics; and 5) little strategy. By gaining a deeper understanding of the challenges that campaigns face and viewing these as opportunities for constructive failure, this may increase their chances of success.