Peace Beyond Order: Solidarity and Resistance Against Sta:st-Brahmanical Hegemony
Zeus Hans Mendez
Affilia:on: PhD Candidate, University of Innsbruck, Austria
This paper intervenes in contemporary debates on peace by reorien:ng the concept of peace
through resistance, epistemic disobedience, and acts of protest, proposing that peace must be
understood as the labor of libera:on rather than the maintenance of order. It challenges
dominant frameworks that equate peace with stability, ins:tu:onal control, or the mi:ga:on of
visible violence, and specifically intervenes against the no:on of “peace as a state of harmony
within the established order” (Maldonado-Torres 2020). Recent scholarship demonstrates that
dominant frameworks oYen naturalize violent racialized, sta:st, and colonial hierarchies as
neutral condi:ons of peace (Lazic & Stavrevska 2024; Azarmandi 2023; 2018). Extending these
cri:ques to India, the paper examines how casteist-sta:st hegemony, majoritarian law-and-order
regimes, and developmental na:onalism define peace as obedience, silence, and social
acquiescence while criminalizing dissen:ng communi:es as disorderly or an:-na:onal.
Against these epistemic and material configura:ons, the paper argues for a conceptualiza:on of
peace as a situated ethical prac:ce that emerges both in shared infrastructures of resistance and
in the sustained efforts of specific movements to resist structural violence. Peace is enacted
through solidari:es across an:-caste, Adivasi, Muslim, and leY movements, but also through
sustained acts of collec:ve refusal, self-asser:on, and resilience against systemic oppression by
these movements. Drawing on ar:cula:on of maitri (conviviality) as a poli:cal ethic (Ambedkar
1936; Omvedt 2011), Dalit feminist analyses of collec:ve care and rela:onal interdependence
(Paik 2014; Rege 2014), and decolonial feminist work on coali:on and world-traveling (Lugones
2003; Roshanravan 2014), the paper treats these solidari:es and resistances as produc:ve of
alterna:ve social rela:ons and horizons of coexistence.
Empirically, shared spaces of dissent, protest infrastructures, mutual protec:on networks, and
joint poli:cal declara:ons are analyzed in demonstra:ng how oppressed communi:es collec:vely
2
sustain dignity, safety, and rela:onal jus:ce. By foregrounding both inter-movement solidari:es
and sustained movement-specific struggles, the ar:cle posi:ons resistance movements as a
genera:ve interlocutor for peace studies, expanding the field beyond sta:st, developmental, and
juridical paradigms toward approaches aeen:ve to race, caste, gender, coloniality, and uneven
vulnerability. It argues that meaningful peace cannot be analy:cally or materially decoupled from
struggles against domina:on; it is sustained through rela:onal contesta:on, collec:ve survival,
and enduring commitments to libera:on. In doing so, it demonstrates that both the everyday and
strategic prac:ces of resistance cons:tute a form of peace as libera:on, challenging conven:onal
epistemologies that equate peace solely with order.
Share on socials
Register for the Conference
Register to attend the Conference, online or in person, starting from only $10!
You will get unlimited access to sessions like this, 1 year FREE Resistance Studies Hub membership, which includes Journal of Resistance Studies, Resistance Studies Network community platform, and future events and activites. You will have the chance to learn, share, network, connect with Resistance scholars and activists from all around the world!